The team leaders (‘coordinators’) of the political groups on the European Parliament’s environment committee gathered for one of our regular business planning meetings.
The chairman, a German socialist who had perhaps been nobbled by one of his British Labour colleagues, started the session by referring to the fact that the Parliament’s delegation to the Copenhagen conference would include a climate change ‘denier’ who would hardly represent the majority view in meetings with other parliamentarians.
The arrangement is that every group gets representation in proportion to its size, but was there anything we should do?
I spoke first. “I know who you are referring to. I disagree strongly with his views. But this Parliament represents all shades of opinion, and there are many people who are not convinced by the scientific evidence on climate change. I must support the right of free speech.”
One by one the spokesman for the other groups – left, right and green, Austrian, Danish and Finnish – all expressed the same view.
So that was that.
Which will no doubt upset Nick Griffin greatly. How he would have loved to have been able to criticise the “Establishment’s” conspiracy to silence him.
Friday, 4 December 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment